The Case Against Atheism - Dr. William Lane Craig
February 23rd, 2009 by admin
This is a short video of Dr. William Lane Craig in a debate addressing faulty arguments for atheism.
Check www.leestrobel.com for hundreds of excellent FREE Christian videos.
Todd Tyszka
www.toddtyszka.com
Dr. william lane craig atheism Jesus Christ Christian evidence case proof proves evidence debate debated debates debating apologist apologetic apologetics atheist atheists agnostic agnostics skeptic skeptics Bible Scripture Scriptures Gospel Gospels strobel
Duration : 0:6:50
Posted in docbates
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“No good sir I …
“No good sir I haven’t spouted a single fallacy that is false.”
Your argument is full of fallacies, as I have pointed out specifically and explained at every point. You’ve yet to show how your arguments are otherwise aside from crying ‘no they aren’t’.
Even still, you persist on demanding that I give evidence, when you can’t even clarify what I am supposed to be trying to prove.
This has degraded to mere bickering. An argument implies that you actually have a point, which you can’t establish
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“How many times …
“How many times have I asked for your evidence or attempted to get you to even talk about it.”
Oh, you mean pushing the demonstrated fallacy and straw man. Sorry, that isn’t refuting anything, and that this is the only excuse or example you can pull demonstrates another lie in your rhetoric.
You seem unable to help yourself.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Craig is long …
Craig is long overdue for the Hitchens smackdown™Pat.Pend.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
I could only …
I could only imagine your parties to be a form of ‘my dick’s bigger then yours’ contest.
You are a bully.
That’s all it comes down to.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Well, judging by …
Well, judging by your videos you are a very lonely man.
But hey, at least you have god to fall back on.
He should be able to cover up for your inadequacies.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
I thought maybe we …
I thought maybe we would do something on the barbe maybe have a party!
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
You mean you don’t …
You mean you don’t want to be my pal?
I feel rejected.
alone.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Well, it’s not …
Well, it’s not necessary to be psychic, when in both of your videos addressed to TJ you held up your fat and sweaty arms in a foolish manner to show how much of a man you are.
Doesn’t take a psychic to work out that you are a scared little man.
I’m not here to defend TJ as he is quite capable of doing that himself.
I just find it amusing that you decided to take down your videos AND close an account.
Scared? I think so.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Ah,we have mind …
Ah,we have mind reader!
Quick,can you give me the texas lottery numbers for wednesday I’ll send some money your way.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
No.
I think you …
No.
I think you are an arrogant and immature man.
You attempted to use bully boy tactics because you didn’t like someones point of view.
You say ‘crazy’ but we both know you were serious.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
I was scared making …
I was scared making those vids !!
But after awhile you get more comfortable.
Did you notice I was more comfortable in my last one to ol loser TJ?
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
I never claimed any …
I never claimed any skills at debating friend.
Glad you saw my crazy vids they were crazy weren’t they lol.
I think me and you can be real pals don’t you?
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Scared?
You …
Scared?
You certainly looked a bit scared when you posted two videos attempting to intimidate The Amazing Atheist, one as ‘ESoutherly’ and one as ‘droptopcadillac’
You also spouted a ridiculous attempt to refute James Randi.
I suggest you look closely at what sort of man you’re pretending to be. In your past videos you came of as an anti social bully with all the skills of a 13 year old adolescent.
Keep kidding yourself that you are an intelligent, rational debater, when some know different.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Hmm,guess not all …
Hmm,guess not all christians are afraid of you atheists it appears.
What do you think?
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
(Tell you what. …
(Tell you what. Look back over the conversation and show me one point at which you actually did instead of offering a derivative of ‘no u’.)
O geez lets see. How many times have I asked for your evidence or attempted to get you to even talk about it.
Probably a dozen.
Didn’t need the luck after all but thanks
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
(You commit a …
(You commit a fallacy, complain when i call you out on it, and then repeat it as if I’m going to forget that you haven’t addressed the original subject of your particular god.
This is what I mean about derailing the topic. )
No good sir I haven’t spouted a single fallacy that is false.
And I haven’t said I wasn’t going to give evidence for God.
Its just your not going to worm out of giving yours and attack my argument skills etc to avoid having evidence.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“I site them …
“I site them everytime tit for tat big boy.
Saying I don’t don’t help you.”
Tell you what. Look back over the conversation and show me one point at which you actually did instead of offering a derivative of ‘no u’.
Good luck.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
(Not only is half …
(Not only is half of this not relevant, but you can’t even cite specific instances.)
I site them everytime tit for tat big boy.
Saying I don’t don’t help you.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“You have a …
“You have a position that you refuse to give evidence for.
All thils crap about my logic skills is just to avoid the issue.”
You commit a fallacy, complain when i call you out on it, and then repeat it as if I’m going to forget that you haven’t addressed the original subject of your particular god.
This is what I mean about derailing the topic.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
(You make an …
(You make an emotional appeal (as dead atheists have nothing to do with the topic, and prove nothing), and claim that I’m lying when I point it out?)
Its not an emotional appeal good sir thats where you are wrong.
Its as much of logic as logic is logic kind sir.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“No,our …
“No,our conversation has been of what you don’t know about logic or philosophy and where ethics begin or end or basic rational thinking.”
Not only is half of this not relevant, but you can’t even cite specific instances.
You’re just saying this to say it.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
You have a position …
You have a position that you refuse to give evidence for.
All thils crap about my logic skills is just to avoid the issue.
still waiting
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“Those aren’t …
“Those aren’t fallacies you are lieing sir.
Or just ignorant of the subject.”
You make an emotional appeal (as dead atheists have nothing to do with the topic, and prove nothing), and claim that I’m lying when I point it out?
If you’re confused on what a logical fallacy is, wikipedia has a list of them you can reference. It might help.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
(Bits and pieces? …
(Bits and pieces? Our entire conversation has essentially been a demonstration on what you don’t know about logic. I’ve made it a point to tell you specifically where and when you are committing them. You don’t have much of an excuse on this. )
No,our conversation has been of what you don’t know about logic or philosophy and where ethics begin or end or basic rational thinking.
You certainly don’t have an excuse for this good sir.
But please cont.
February 23rd, 2009 at 9:10 pm
“It was just a …
“It was just a singular point. You build opinions based on bits and pieces and then say “logic isn’t my strong suit lol.”
Bits and pieces? Our entire conversation has essentially been a demonstration on what you don’t know about logic. I’ve made it a point to tell you specifically where and when you are committing them. You don’t have much of an excuse on this.